Apply with accurate information
Applicants must provide correct legal name, address, country, sites, activities, buyer wording, documents, and requested scope.
These rules explain how AQX handles applications, scope review, certificate use, public verification, corrections, suspension, withdrawal, and applicant responsibilities.
Applicants must provide correct legal name, address, country, sites, activities, buyer wording, documents, and requested scope.
AQX may request corrections when the proposed certificate scope is broader than the evidence, activities, sites, or eligibility support.
Payment, application, or document upload does not guarantee issuance. A record is issued only after suitability and evidence review.
A certificate may be used only for the listed holder, scope, sites, status, dates, and limitations. Buyer acceptance remains subject to the buyer requirement that created the request.
Eligible records may appear in the AQX public registry with ID, holder, scope, dates, status, framework note, and limitations.
AQX may suspend, withdraw, correct, or remove a record where misuse, incorrect information, non-payment, complaint, or scope issue is identified.
AQX handles client information according to confidentiality and conflict-of-interest controls, while keeping public registry data limited to verification needs.
Certificate holders should notify AQX of material changes to legal name, address, ownership, scope, sites, status, activities, or buyer-facing claims.
Every support page should move the visitor from vague interest to a clear buying decision: what the buyer wants, what the organization can prove, and whether the route is worth budget.
Clauses, portal text, tender wording, country context, and deadline details turn an unclear request into something AQX can actually review.
The route only makes sense when the activities, sites, services, and legal entity match what the buyer is asking for.
Useful files include records, policies, procedures, monitoring, training, and prior assessments that support the claim being made.
If the requirement still looks ambiguous or misaligned, AQX should review it before the applicant spends on the wrong path.